Hurricane Consulting, Inc. (B-423839, B-423839.3, B-423839.4, B-423839.5)

Hurricane Consulting, Inc. (B-423839, B-423839.3, B-423839.4, B-423839.5)
Photo by Alberto Rodríguez / Unsplash

You should not care.

Categories: Key personnel, technical unacceptability, interested party

Date: 2 January 2026

URL: https://www.gao.gov/products/b-423839,b-423839.3,b-423839.4,b-423839.5

Hurricane Consulting protested its elimination from a VA warehouse logistics competition, arguing the agency unreasonably found its proposal unacceptable and mishandled its past performance evaluation.

GAO denied the core challenge. The VA reasonably found that two proposed shift supervisors did not meet the solicitation’s minimum experience requirement for supervising warehouse logistical operations. Because the resumes failed to clearly demonstrate the required supervisory background, the agency properly assessed deficiencies that rendered the proposal unacceptable.

That finding also ended Hurricane’s remaining arguments. Once the proposal was reasonably found technically unacceptable and therefore unawardable, Hurricane was not an interested party to keep pressing its past-performance complaints.

Digest

  1. Protest challenging agency's evaluation of protester's proposal as unacceptable is denied where the agency reasonably assessed a deficiency to the protester's proposed key personnel for failing to satisfy the solicitation's minimum requirements.
  2. Protester is not an interested party to challenge agency's past performance evaluation where the agency reasonably assessed a deficiency under the organizational management factor, rendering the proposal unacceptable and unawardable.